Canada Will Contribute to the EU

Cooperation agreement can be made by people to people, people to companies, companies with the company, the company with the state (government), state by state. But what is the core of a cooperation agreement, in the sense of expectation of a cooperation agreement that has been made?

Of course you do not want to or loss of the cooperation agreement, related in business and economics. The answer is none other than to obtain added value, that is the hope of obtaining the added value of the cooperation agreement between the two sides. However, it should be understood that this added value can be something visible (material) or invisible (goodwill, knowledge, relationships, easing, space access and others). The problem is how to measure to determine the added value? either in the form of material and invisible.

Recent news related to the collapse of trade agreements (FTA) between Canada and the EU. With the cooperation of course both sides want to get added value, from my analysis of the added value of 9.14% and 7.64% for the EU (depending on which value you want to use) than the proportion of countries that can significantly affect the economic of the EU. Based on my analysis of 13 countries that significantly directly on economic conditions in the EU, and one of them is Canada. This analysis is based on data that has me though, I never studied the history of the bilateral relations of the EU before, but from what I have gained is indeed fit.

Then what is the meaning of these values?
As I have explained, any agreement has been made certainly want to gain added value either materially or invisible even perhaps both. In this case, some residents of Belgium does not approve the agreement for several reasons, such as market competition, labor, and others. But from the numbers 9.14% and 7.64% if the EU is to waste because it is the interpretation of the agreement, that Canada will contribute by approximately 9% or 8% for the economy in the EU.

Then how to respond to these values?
EU may use these numbers as a reference the optimal value. For example, if the goods produced from Canada are in the proportion of 9.14% or 7.64% of the total number of imported goods, because if bigger is certainly a problem.

Another example, if access to the market in Canada has been able to reflect the value of this 9.14%, higher if it is an advantage for the EU or otherwise, whether the product's market share Canada able to press by the EU until the 9.14% of the proportion of the market share of other products.

And examples of assessment proportion of the other, in the sense of these value is the space in assessing the advantages or disadvantages of the cooperation agreement are built.

Thank you